Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Shanahan's avatar

Of the several reasons why I've been against a $1.5T defense budget, what we're seeing play out with reconciliation is near the top of my list. It boxes in the Department, and Pentagon leaders are now facing suboptimal choices as a result of betting big without first fully understanding the table dynamics. (Meanwhile, DoE's Genesis Mission, which is one of the most promising AI projects in the world, faces budgetary strangulation at birth--with costs well under $1B for the entire thing. Not good, Mav, not good.)

DPA for accelerated munitions production sounds promising, but every company involved wants/needs a greater upfront funding commitment by the Pentagon before scaling. Big capex bills and long-term hiring commitments require shared agreements between the Pentagon and industry.

Huge fan of the RJ, but adding a drone mission would change how that platform is viewed. Crossing the Title 50 ISR & Title 10 streams in this way would shift it into a different category, with lots of potential unintended consequences. Worth exploring, but be careful what you ask for.

Dan McRae's avatar

excellent article. good data, well presented

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?